wind power in Großsolt?
On 11 The community council met in March (GM) and had a heavy agenda. In
TOP 23 was discussed, the message of suitable sites for wind turbines in the municipality intensive.
should be sought given to suitable sites, the first proposed in the circle and must be approved by him. If these areas are there on good will push, the proposal is passed to the country which has ultimate decision power as to which areas are best. It was unanimously decided that two faces, a Kollerup east, south and between Bondenau L 193, as well as in Gräsungsweg to propose to the border with Havetoft.
When this decision to the District should meet with approval, I have suggested that a residents meeting is held, in which space and time for discussion, since this resolution is isolated in the present citizens not met with favor.
It is a question of whether we do in the east and south-west area to allow the community that wind turbines erected be.
Why did the GA voted unanimously for it?
are Essentially there are three reasons: first
reduce to the World Climate Change and the related obligation to reduce emissions of climate-damaging substances are taken into account.
second The implementation of related EU, federal and state objectives and targets can be supported on a small scale on our local level by a few wind turbines.
third The poor pay the community could be improved by accumulating trade tax revenue.
The earth is getting warmer, and most important cause is the man: in particular the burning of fossil fuels, but also the clearing of forests, the concentration of greenhouse gases can rise into the atmosphere. Doubling the concentration of carbon dioxide (previously, the value increased from 280 to 385 ppm) would raise the temperature of the Earth by about 3 degrees Celsius, which would have catastrophic consequences.
The earth has a fever!
The Internet provides a wealth of information on climate change.
proposal:
a comprehensive Overview is the 4th Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC) of the United Nations. He is the latest report in a series that regularly summarizes the scientific knowledge about global warming. At a distance of five to six years issued IPCC - are widely regarded as reports consensus position within the climatological experts regarding the impact of humans on the Earth's climate.
Even before the light of this knowledge, the politically active actors in the world the duty to act responsibly and with appropriate environmental policy choices of the climate has not itself to leave, and certainly not business and industry. Worldwide, the will exists to greenhouse gas emission reduction. The Kyoto Protocol - Protocol of 1997 has set the goal of developed countries, their emissions from 1990 to 2012 by about 5% lower.
What does the EU?
Even before the light of this knowledge, the politically active actors in the world the duty to act responsibly and with appropriate environmental policy choices of the climate has not itself to leave, and certainly not business and industry. Worldwide, the will exists to greenhouse gas emission reduction. The Kyoto Protocol - Protocol of 1997 has set the goal of developed countries, their emissions from 1990 to 2012 by about 5% lower.
What does the EU?
you also sets goals. To limit global warming to 2 º C, will require global greenhouse gas emissions over the next 15 years, and throttled by 2050 reduced to half the 1990 level. In a first step, the developed countries greenhouse gas emissions by 2020, bringing to 30% below the 1990 level.
Therefore, the EU has obliged to reduce their own greenhouse gas emissions, independent of the other countries in 2020 to at least 20%.
key element to achieving, among many other measures, including a policy on renewable energy sources. And wind power is currently significantly to near-coastal and wind-rich regions.
Therefore, the EU has obliged to reduce their own greenhouse gas emissions, independent of the other countries in 2020 to at least 20%. key element to achieving, among many other measures, including a policy on renewable energy sources. And wind power is currently significantly to near-coastal and wind-rich regions.
More about climate change: http://www.ec.europa.eu/climateaction
Schleswig-Holstein
generally recognized as a policy directive on the energy mix: mixture of coal, nuclear and wind as Leitenergie.
national target is calculated to cover the energy needs by 2020 through renewable energy. Total supply from wind power will be sought. This requires a tripling of today's performance.
Our circle
national target is calculated to cover the energy needs by 2020 through renewable energy. Total supply from wind power will be sought. This requires a tripling of today's performance.
Our circle
will therefore identify an additional 490 hectares of land suitability, which will deliver 39 new wind turbines could.
Now we are arriving at the local level and our responsibility to future cooperation, as in 2 addressed clearly.
There remains the third The financial component that
Now we are arriving at the local level and our responsibility to future cooperation, as in 2 addressed clearly.
There remains the third The financial component that
business tax revenue.
Since January 2009, the federal legislature adopted a rule under which the business tax to 70% after the relevant tax tangible assets and 30% after the wages between the location of the company and the location of the plant / s is broken. This is guaranteed to benefit all the communities in which a foreign company, run by a wind turbine is not affected by business taxes. Better would be if the operator would be local residents, because it remains the entire business tax in the municipality.
The amount of this income is subject to the provision of facilities, would be significant.
I think this should make it clear approximate the overall context and background for the unanimous vote of the municipal council for each wind power.
Since January 2009, the federal legislature adopted a rule under which the business tax to 70% after the relevant tax tangible assets and 30% after the wages between the location of the company and the location of the plant / s is broken. This is guaranteed to benefit all the communities in which a foreign company, run by a wind turbine is not affected by business taxes. Better would be if the operator would be local residents, because it remains the entire business tax in the municipality.
The amount of this income is subject to the provision of facilities, would be significant.
I think this should make it clear approximate the overall context and background for the unanimous vote of the municipal council for each wind power.